Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Yes, but some other followups suggest that maybe a "named > transaction" does something else entirely. Thus my request for a > definition of what the OP is actually asking for. Well, a quick google search suggests that all three guesses here were off base. This is the best clue I could find with a two-minute perusal: # TRANSACTION_HANDLE -> use a named transaction. Firebird allows # multiple transactions per connection. In the case below, this # request is run in the system transaction - not available outside the # engine. The system transaction number is 0 and it is # "pre-committed" meaning that its changes are immediately visible to # all other transactions. Does that send a nasty chill up anyone else's spine? -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
