Greg Stark <greg.st...@enterprisedb.com> wrote: >> On Jun 17, 2009, at 8:08 AM, Tom Lane wrote: >> >>> Pavel Golub <pa...@microolap.com> writes: >>>> Is there any possibility that Postgres will have named >>>> transaction ever, like Firebird? >>> >>> What in heck is a named transaction, and why should we care? > I'm curious what they ate too I don't know about Firebird, but in Sybase the transaction name just shows up in the process list, so you can tell what type of transaction is running. It's a solution to the "what the heck is that idle transaction from" -- as long as meaningful transaction names are consistently used. -Kevin
-- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
