Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes:
> On Tuesday 14 April 2009 21:34:51 Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>> I think we can handle that and the cases Tom presents by erroring out when
>> the U& syntax is used with stdstr off.
> Proposed patch for that attached.
I have not been able to think of any security hole in that proposal,
so this patch seems acceptable to me. I wonder though whether any
corresponding change is needed in psql's lexer, and if so how should
it react exactly to the rejection case.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
