On Tuesday 14 April 2009 21:48:12 Tom Lane wrote: > Peter Eisentraut <pete...@gmx.net> writes: > > I think we can handle that and the cases Tom presents by erroring out > > when the U& syntax is used with stdstr off. > > I think you're missing the point --- this is not about whether the > syntax is unambiguous (it is already) but about whether a frontend that > doesn't understand it 100% will be secure against subversion. I have no > confidence in the latter assumption.
I think I am getting the point quite well. Do you have an example how this can be subverted? -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
