On Sat, Mar 21, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Tom Lane <t...@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote: > Robert Treat <xzi...@users.sourceforge.net> writes: >> We've been talking about this magical "proper module facility" for a few >> releases now... are we still opposed to putting contrib modules in thier own >> schema? > > I'm hesitant to do that when we don't yet have either a design or a > migration plan for the module facility. We might find we'd shot > ourselves in the foot, or at least complicated the migration situation > unduly.
I think there have been a few designs proposed, but I think part of the problem is a lack of agreement on the requirements. "module facility" seems to mean a lot of different things to different people. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
