On Mon, 2009-03-09 at 20:05 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> "Joshua D. Drake" <j...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> > Is there any possibility of having it be enabled at compile time?
> 
> That's been assumed right along (unless you think it's okay for Postgres
> to stop working on every non-SELinux platform). 

Good point.

>  The problem here is
> mostly about whether we have enough confidence in the code to put our
> project name on it.

This patch has been bandied about for what, two years? There is a known
fork of our project that runs with it. It has a live googlecode site:

http://code.google.com/p/sepgsql/

Which has lots of documentation. 

I also appears to be active within the SE community:

http://www.nsa.gov/applications/search/index.cfm?q=se-postgresql

It is also part of the Secure OS project out of Japan (as far as I can
tell).

I know we are a little uncomfortable here but KaiGai-San (forgive me if
I type that wrong) has proven to be a contributor in his own right,
jumping over every hurdle we have presented him. He is obviously
sticking around for a while.

If we accept this code, we lose a fork of our project (good) and we pull
those people into our project (better) and hopefully they will help us
mature the project over time (best).

Sincerely,

Joshua D. Drake





> 
>                       regards, tom lane
> 
-- 
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org
   Consulting, Development, Support, Training
   503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
   The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997


-- 
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers

Reply via email to