On Wed, 2009-03-04 at 15:50 -0500, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > > It seems to me that the best method would be to follow the > > information_schema naming conventions as information_schema is standard > > compliant (right?). > > > > Thoughts? > > > > > What would be the benefit? Apart from satisfying a passion for consistency?
It would lower the cost (intellectually as well as dollars) of development and administration for every single user of the database. I can't count how many times I accidentally type tablename versus table_name or worse relname, etc... Sincerely, Joshua D. Drake -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
