Hello,
Something that continues to grind my teeth about our software is that we
are horribly inconsistent with our system catalogs. Now I am fully and
100% aware that changing this will break things in user land but I want
to do it anyway. In order to do that I believe we need to come up with a
very loud, extremely verbose method of communicating to people that 8.5
*will* break things.
It seems to me that the best method would be to follow the
information_schema naming conventions as information_schema is standard
compliant (right?).
Thoughts?
Examples:
postgres=# \d pg_class
Table "pg_catalog.pg_class"
Column | Type | Modifiers
----------------+-----------+-----------
relname | name | not null
relnamespace | oid | not null
[...]
postgres=# \d pg_tables
View "pg_catalog.pg_tables"
Column | Type | Modifiers
-------------+---------+-----------
schemaname | name |
tablename | name |
postgres=# \d pg_stat_user_tables
View "pg_catalog.pg_stat_user_tables"
Column | Type | Modifiers
------------------+--------------------------+-----------
relid | oid |
schemaname | name |
relname | name |
postgres=# \d information_schema.tables
View "information_schema.tables"
Column | Type |
Modifiers
------------------------------+-----------------------------------+-----------
table_catalog | information_schema.sql_identifier |
table_schema | information_schema.sql_identifier |
table_name | information_schema.sql_identifier |
--
PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org
Consulting, Development, Support, Training
503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
