On Fri, 2009-01-16 at 13:37 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas <robertmh...@gmail.com> writes: > > I feel pretty strongly that making the pattern search against a > > different list of stuff than what the same command would display > > without the pattern is confusing and a bad idea. It's a bad idea > > regardless of which particular backslash-sequence we're talking about. > > Well, I'm perfectly happy to drop that stipulation and just go with > > \df -- all > \dfS -- system only > \dfU -- non-system only > > but are we willing to change \d and \dt to work that way too? > Or should we leave them inconsistent? >
I would prefer them consistent. Joshua D. Drake > regards, tom lane > -- PostgreSQL - XMPP: jdr...@jabber.postgresql.org Consulting, Development, Support, Training 503-667-4564 - http://www.commandprompt.com/ The PostgreSQL Company, serving since 1997 -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
