> One issue here is that plain \d gets less useful because it'll now > include system catalogs. We could add the additional rule that > the above statements apply only when a pattern is specified, and > without a pattern you get just user stuff (so omitting a pattern > corresponds to pattern "*" with the U modifier, not just "*"). > This would probably make it a bit easier to have exactly the same > rules across the board.
Changing the scope of the search on the basis of whether or not a pattern is present strikes me as a terrible idea. It's confusing and unlikely to make anyone happy. ...Robert -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
