Alvaro Herrera <alvhe...@commandprompt.com> writes:
> They are both very lean, so no objections. I guess that the pg_type.h
> inclusion is needed due to the predefined type OIDs, and it makes me
> wonder whether it would be useful to have them in a separate header.
> Not enough concern for the idea to even make it to Bruce's open items
> mailbox ...
After the header refactoring Zdenek did last year, there's not much
reason to not just #include pg_type.h --- so I'd just as soon keep
those macros together with the associated DATA lines.
regards, tom lane
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
