Tom Lane wrote: > I wrote: > > Okay, I'll do a trial patch and we can see exactly how much has to be > > added (at least among core and contrib) before deciding for sure. > > This compiles and passes regression tests. It looks like the main > things there might be an argument for adding back to spi.h would be > pg_type.h and builtins.h, as a very large proportion of the files > using spi.h had to have those added. Comments?
They are both very lean, so no objections. I guess that the pg_type.h inclusion is needed due to the predefined type OIDs, and it makes me wonder whether it would be useful to have them in a separate header. Not enough concern for the idea to even make it to Bruce's open items mailbox ... -- Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/ PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
