Re: [HACKERS] New to_timestamp implementation is pretty strict

[David E. Wheeler]

On Dec 1, 2008, at 4:07 PM, Alvaro Herrera wrote:

David E. Wheeler wrote:

Oh, well yeah, it should be consistent. But I'm still not sure that :3

should be allowed. OTOH, who does that, anyway?

Anyone who prints times as %d:%d:%d.  You can find those in the wild.

I guess I should have expected that. Sheesh.

Best,

David


--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers