On Tue, 23 Sep 2008 09:14:33 +0200 "Stephen R. van den Berg" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joshua D. Drake wrote: > >Andrew Dunstan wrote: > >>There are in fact very few letters available, as we've been fairly > >>profligate in our use of option letters in the pg_dump suite. > > >>j and m happen to be two of those that are available. > > >--max-workers > > Perhaps, but please do not use that as justification for using -m. > That would be equally silly as abbreviating "number of workers" to -n. Actually I came up with it because it coincides with existing terminology. Autovacuum has the concept of max_workers. Joshua D. Drake -- The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/ United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/ -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
