On Mon, 2008-09-22 at 15:05 -0400, Andrew Dunstan wrote: > j and m happen to be two of those that are available. > > I honestly don't have a terribly strong opinion about what it should be > called. I can live with jobs or multi-threads.
Perhaps we can use -j for jobs and -m for memory, so we can set memory available across all threads with a single total value. I can live with jobs or multi-threads also, whichever we decide. Neither one is confusing to explain. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
