On Sat, 2008-09-20 at 09:06 -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > On Sat, 20 Sep 2008 13:47:10 +0300 > Hannu Krosing <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Fri, 2008-09-19 at 16:37 -0400, D'Arcy J.M. Cain wrote: > > > I don't think that we should rush into any one language without > > > checking the alternatives. Personally I think we should port everything > > > to Intercal. > > > > My choice would be whitespace , see > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Whitespace_(programming_language) > > Hey, we could write two modules into each file, one in Intercal and > another in Whitespace. :-)
Good idea! if we are smart, we can interweave them so that the whitespace inside intercal forms the source code of the Whitespace program. That would almost be Literate Programming - if you are not sure, what some part of the program does, you can immediately look at the other implementation. --------------- Hannu -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
