-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Who can resist the programming language game?
Le 19 sept. 08 à 22:37, D'Arcy J.M. Cain a écrit :
On Fri, 19 Sep 2008 20:57:36 +0100
"Dave Page" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 19, 2008 at 8:54 PM, Gevik Babakhani <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Has there been any idea to port PG to a more modern programming
language
like C++? Of course there are some minor obstacles like a new OO
design,
The plan is to start porting it to Java after the next release -
probably at the beginning of April.
I don't think that we should rush into any one language without
checking the alternatives. Personally I think we should port
everything
to Intercal.
May I recall Greenspun's Tenth Rule of Programming: "any sufficiently
complicated C or Fortran program contains an ad hoc informally-
specified bug-ridden slow implementation of half of Common Lisp".
Regards,
- --
dim
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkjVVZUACgkQlBXRlnbh1bl/6gCcDhLEAdy+pZnjGnKSly3jmZqC
5pYAoMbseRc3Di49dRnr4XLDIGJOApFz
=Qj2e
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
