On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > 2008/7/25 Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:52 AM, daveg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> It seems to me that a sql-like client side scripting language should be as >>> similar as possible to plpgsql. Pgscript looks a bit like plpgsql, but is >>> pretty much incompatible with it for no particularly obvious reason. >> >> pgScript originally used a c-like syntax when it was pgUnitTest iirc. >> The new version is designed to be familiar to users of T-SQL. > > it is little bit unhappy - it's like T-SQL, but it isn't T-SQL - and > it's far to plpgsql
I see no point in replicating pl/pgsql. Better to implement anonymous blocks in the server for that. -- Dave Page EnterpriseDB UK: http://www.enterprisedb.com -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers