On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:40 +0100, Dave Page wrote: > On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 9:36 AM, Pavel Stehule <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > 2008/7/25 Dave Page <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > >> On Fri, Jul 25, 2008 at 8:52 AM, daveg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >>> It seems to me that a sql-like client side scripting language should be as > >>> similar as possible to plpgsql. Pgscript looks a bit like plpgsql, but is > >>> pretty much incompatible with it for no particularly obvious reason. > >> > >> pgScript originally used a c-like syntax when it was pgUnitTest iirc. > >> The new version is designed to be familiar to users of T-SQL. > > > > it is little bit unhappy - it's like T-SQL, but it isn't T-SQL - and > > it's far to plpgsql > > I see no point in replicating pl/pgsql. Better to implement anonymous > blocks in the server for that.
Agreed. My suggestion was for something much simpler than either. Complex logic can be done in functions. I just wanted an easy way to write install scripts that work on various releases/schemas/environments, works on core and on any platform. -- Simon Riggs www.2ndQuadrant.com PostgreSQL Training, Services and Support -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
