Mathias Brossard wrote: > From what I gather from those slides it seems to me that the NTT solution > is synchronous not asynchronous. In my opinion it's even better, but I do > understand that others might prefer asynchronous. I'm going to speculate, > but I would think it should be possible (without a substancial rewrite) to > support both modes (or even some intermediate modes, like DRBD on Linux).
Well, we already have asynchronous. The whole point is adding synchronous. -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
