On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 02:13:26PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 12:11:21PM -0400, Brian Hurt wrote: > > Being able to do read-only queries makes this feature more > > valuable in more situations, but I disagree that it's a > > deal-breaker. > > Your managers are apparently more enlightened than some. ;-)
Than most managers, at least in my experience, and since this feature is (IMHO rightly) based around broad adoption, it's a good thing to bring up. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
