On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 10:41:56PM -0400, Andrew Sullivan wrote: > On Sat, May 10, 2008 at 11:55:29AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: > > IMHO a utility command should do one easily-explained thing. The > > fewer options the better. > > Sticking to that principle makes for a better-maintained system. I > agree. If we want to point out, "You might rename your index > afterwards to make it look like other default primary keys," I have > no objection.
For convenience, it might be nice to include the generated name in the notice. Cheers, David. -- David Fetter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://fetter.org/ Phone: +1 415 235 3778 AIM: dfetter666 Yahoo!: dfetter Skype: davidfetter XMPP: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Remember to vote! Consider donating to Postgres: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
