Tom Lane wrote: > Greg Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Usefully organized > > content doesn't magically create itself, it takes work. > > What he said. > > It's worth pointing out here that a whole lot of what is in Bruce's > queue isn't patches or anything close to that, but discussions that he > dropped into the queue until they could get summarized as TODO items. > We've talked about moving the TODO list to the wiki as well. Something > that would perhaps be useful to do in parallel with the patch-reviewing > is to make that happen and start pushing the discussion threads out of > the patch queue and onto the wiki page. Right now it's hard to even > find the reviewable patches among the other stuff.
Yep, lots of TODOs but, again, we have to deal with these sometimes so this is a good time to do it. > I do have a bee in my bonnet about the TODO-to-be threads that revolve > around mapping ideas (free space map, dead space map, known frozen > pages, etc etc). I would like us to consider *all* those ideas as > a group and try to come out with a coherent roadmap for where we are > going to go with them. Perhaps that isn't an appropriate commit-fest > activity, but it needs to happen sometime soon, before anyone starts > spending serious work on these areas. Yep, we need a plan on that thing. I can pull them out into a separate URL when we are ready, and any comments will appear at the new URL. I wish I could move things around myself but the list is dynamic so it isn't possible. -- Bruce Momjian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB http://postgres.enterprisedb.com + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. + -- Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org) To make changes to your subscription: http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
