Tom Lane wrote:
Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I'm noticing a massive reduction in on disk storage required for my
database that I believe is primarily attributable due to Tom's reduced
overhead for short strings.
Twasn't my work; Greg Stark gets most of the credit for that one, and
you might be seeing some benefit from Heikki's work to cut the tuple
header size too.
Oops. You are right. Thanks Greg and Heikki! Whatever you did works
great! :-)
Cheers,
mark
--
Mark Mielke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
