On Sun, Feb 24, 2008 at 5:44 PM, Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Jonah H. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Not stupid, it doesn't work :) This was a limitation of the original > > design based on (IIRC) executor-related issues. > > There are definitional issues not only implementation ones; in > particular, in subquery-like cases it's entirely unclear how many times > the DML operation will or should get evaluated.
Yup,that's what it was. I think I remember the trigger-level and top-level executor-related stuff. If I'm in that area of the code soon, I'll see how much would be involved and if I think I have enough time, submit a proposal for it. -- Jonah H. Harris, Sr. Software Architect | phone: 732.331.1324 EnterpriseDB Corporation | fax: 732.331.1301 499 Thornall Street, 2nd Floor | [EMAIL PROTECTED] Edison, NJ 08837 | http://www.enterprisedb.com/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 4: Have you searched our list archives? http://archives.postgresql.org
