Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Unless we want to abandon MVCC (which I don't), I think an overwriting
>> smgr is impractical.
> Impractical ? Oracle does it.
Oracle has MVCC?
regards, tom lane
---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate
subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your
message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Philip Warner
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
