Hiroshi Inoue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I guess that is the question. Are we heading for an overwriting storage >> manager? > I've never heard that it was given up. So there seems to be > at least a possibility to introduce it in the future. Unless we want to abandon MVCC (which I don't), I think an overwriting smgr is impractical. We need a more complex space-reuse scheme than that. regards, tom lane ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 6: Have you searched our list archives? http://www.postgresql.org/search.mpl
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Philip Warner
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] Plans for solving the VACUUM problem Mikheev, Vadim