Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms

[Tom Lane]

Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Tom Lane writes:
> =================================================
> 1 of 76 tests failed, 1 failed test(s) ignored.
> =================================================
>> 
>> That's just ye olde random "random" failure ...

> Actually, this is one real failed test plus the "random" failure.

(Checks code...)  Hm, you're right.  May I suggest that this is a rather
confusing wording?  Perhaps

 1 of 76 tests failed, plus 1 failed test(s) ignored.

would be less likely to mislead people.

                        regards, tom lane

---------------------------(end of broadcast)---------------------------
TIP 4: Don't 'kill -9' the postmaster