Tom Lane writes: > > and yet another run (and different results): > > > ================================================= > > 1 of 76 tests failed, 1 failed test(s) ignored. > > ================================================= > > That's just ye olde random "random" failure ... Actually, this is one real failed test plus the "random" failure. -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/ ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 3: if posting/reading through Usenet, please send an appropriate subscribe-nomail command to [EMAIL PROTECTED] so that your message can get through to the mailing list cleanly
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Mathijs Brands
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Vince Vielhaber
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Mathijs Brands
- [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Call for platforms Justin Clift