Re: [HACKERS] WAL does not recover gracefully from out-of-disk-space

[Vadim Mikheev]

> Was the following bug already fixed ? I was going to ask same Q. I see that seek+write was changed to write-s in XLogFileInit (that was induced by subj, right?), but what about problem itself? > > DEBUG: redo starts at (0, 21075520) > > The Data Base System is starting up > > DEBUG: open(logfile 0 seg 0) failed: No such file or directory ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ redo started in seg 1 and shouldn't try to read seg 0... BTW, were performance tests run after seek+write --> write-s change? Write-s were not obviously faster to me, that's why I've used seek+write, but never tested that area -:( Vadim ---------------------------(end of broadcast)--------------------------- TIP 2: you can get off all lists at once with the unregister command (send "unregister YourEmailAddressHere" to [EMAIL PROTECTED])