* Tom Lane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [010218 10:53]: > Adriaan Joubert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > fdatasync() is available on Tru64 and according to the man-page behaves > > as Tom expects. So it should be a win for us. > > Careful ... HPUX's man page also claims that fdatasync does something > useful, but it doesn't. I'd recommend an experiment. Does today's > snapshot run any faster for you (without -F) than before? BTW, UnixWare 7.1.1 does *NOT* have fdatasync. What standard created this one? > > regards, tom lane -- Larry Rosenman http://www.lerctr.org/~ler Phone: +1 972-414-9812 E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] US Mail: 1905 Steamboat Springs Drive, Garland, TX 75044-6749
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_delay Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_de... Nathan Myers
- [HACKERS] Re: Re: WAL and commit_de... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_de... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_de... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_de... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_delay Adriaan Joubert
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_de... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_de... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_de... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_de... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit_de... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Jerome Vouillon
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Matthew Kirkwood
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Bruce Momjian