On 17 Feb 2001 at 17:56 (-0500), Tom Lane wrote: [snipped] | Is anyone out there running a 2.4 Linux kernel? Would you try pgbench | with current sources, commit_delay=0, -B at least 1024, no -F, and see | how the results change when pg_fsync is made to call fdatasync instead | of fsync? (It's in src/backend/storage/file/fd.c) I've not run this requested test, but glibc-2.2 provides this bit of code for fdatasync, so it /appears/ to me that kernel version will not affect the test case. [glibc-2.2/sysdeps/generic/fdatasync.c] int fdatasync (int fildes) { return fsync (fildes); } hth. brent -- "We want to help, but we wouldn't want to deprive you of a valuable learning experience." http://openbsd.org/mail.html
- [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_delay Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit_del... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] WAL and commit... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Nathan Myers
- [HACKERS] Re: Re: WAL and co... Brent Verner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: WAL and commit... Adriaan Joubert
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Larry Rosenman
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: WAL and co... Nathan Myers