Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The patch I recommended was > - LDFLAGS_SL := -Bdynamic -shared -soname $(shlib) > + LDFLAGS_SL := -Bdynamic -shared -soname >lib$(NAME)$(DLSUFFIX).$(SO_MAJOR_VERSION) And that is what was in 7.0.3. > but that's not what your patch does. The issue is fixed, you shouldn't > patch anything. Oh, OK. Easy enough to delete that section and see where the chips fall. > > > #! /usr/bin/env perl > > No, for a RedHat or any other Linux distribution, /usr/bin is where perl > > and python (or their symlinks) will always live. > I was thinking in terms of fixing this in the source tree. Oh. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploa... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? Lamar Owen
- [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? bpalmer
- Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop