Tom Lane wrote: > Let me know when you think the 7.1 RPM specfile is stable enough to be > worth testing, and I'll try to build PPC RPMs. Ok. Should be coincident with -2. I'm planning to have a -2 out later this week. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploa... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being u... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 bei... Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Peter Eisentraut
- [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? bpalmer
- Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] $PGDATA/base/??? Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop
- Re: [HACKERS] RPMS for 7.1beta3 being uploaded. Karl DeBisschop