On Thu, 11 Jan 2001, Tom Lane wrote: > Lamar Owen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> I'm unhappy again. Bad enough we accepted a new feature during beta; > >> now we're going to expect an absolutely virgin contrib module to work > >> everywhere in order to pass regress tests? > > > Last I checked, two contrib modules had to be built for regression > > testing. > > Sure, but they've been there awhile. All of my concerns here are > schedule-driven: do we really want to be wringing out a new contrib > module, to the point where it will run everywhere, before we can > release 7.1? Hrmmm ... just a thought here, but how about a potential 'interactive' regression test, where it asks if you want to run regress on GiST? If so, do it, if not, ignore it ... ?
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr