Oleg Bartunov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >>>> No way, we need to load functions. there are several contributions >>>> which depends on loaded functions. If you suggest how to do this >>>> in general way, it would fine. To test GiST you need to define some >>>> data structure ( in our case - RD-tree) and functions to access it >> >> Look at regress/input/create_function_1.source for hints from >> SPI tests... Um, you do realize that a contrib module that gets used as part of the regress tests may as well be mainstream? At least in terms of the portability requirements it will have to meet? I'm unhappy again. Bad enough we accepted a new feature during beta; now we're going to expect an absolutely virgin contrib module to work everywhere in order to pass regress tests? regards, tom lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Lamar Owen
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Thomas Lockhart
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... The Hermit Hacker
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST for... Peter Eisentraut