> Um, you do realize that a contrib module that gets used as part of the > regress tests may as well be mainstream? At least in terms of the > portability requirements it will have to meet? > > I'm unhappy again. Bad enough we accepted a new feature during beta; > now we're going to expect an absolutely virgin contrib module to work > everywhere in order to pass regress tests? Ops, agreed. And I fear that in current code there is no one GiST index implementation -:( Should we worry about regress tests? -:) Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: AW: Re: GiST... selkovjr
- [HACKERS] Getting configure to... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: Getting configur... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Getting conf... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: Getting conf... Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] R-Tree implementatio... Oleg Bartunov
- Re: [HACKERS] R-Tree implement... Bruce Momjian
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- RE: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Hannu Krosing
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1 !! Oleg Bartunov
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for 7.1... Tom Lane
- Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: AW: ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... Tom Lane
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: Beta4 for GiST? (Was: Re: ... Bruce Momjian
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: GiST for... Bruce Momjian