Patrick Welche writes: > On Sun, Dec 31, 2000 at 01:06:40PM +0100, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > > > > I've removed the statement for now, since it was being used incorrectly > > anyway, but for the future I suggest that NetBSD catch up, if it wants to > > stay compatible. > > Thank you, and Jaromir tells me he'll commit a fix to NetBSD within days! Btw., what would be involved in using NetBSD's libedit transparently for PostgreSQL? In particular these questions arise: * What library name to look for * What header files to look for * Is history automatically included with line editing? * How to avoid using an old or non-NetBSD libedit -- Peter Eisentraut [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://yi.org/peter-e/
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Dominic J. Eidson
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker