Peter Eisentraut <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If libedit could be used as an alternative to readline depending on your > operating system setup then there's nothing wrong with that. I have no objection to being able to work with either one, if someone's excited about making that happen. I'd still think it a waste of effort, but as long as it's not my effort I can hardly complain... regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Bierman
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alex Pilosov
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Alfred Perlstein
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Patrick Welche
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Patrick Welche
- NetBSD libedit (Re: [HACKERS] GNU readl... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD lice... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Trond Eivind Glomsrød
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Dominic J. Eidson
- Re: [HACKERS] GNU readline and BSD license Peter Eisentraut