On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 12:03:52AM +1100, Horst Herb wrote: > AFAIK the thread for "built in" crcs referred only to CRCs in > the transaction log. We have been discussing checksums for both the table blocks and for the transaction log. > Always remember that a psotgres data base on the harddisk can be > manipulated accidentally / maliciously without postgres even running. > These are the cases where you need row level CRCs. "There is no security without physical security." If somebody can change the row contents, they can also change the row and/or block checksum to match. Nathan Myers [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Tom Lane
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing versi... Nathan Myers
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing v... Tom Lane
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testi... Nathan Myers
- [HACKERS] RFC: CRC datatype Horst Herb
- RE: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC datatype Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC datatype Horst Herb
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC datat... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC d... Horst Herb
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC d... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC datat... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC d... Horst Herb
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing v... Bruce Guenter
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testi... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta t... Bruce Guenter
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testi... Tom Lane
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta t... Bruce Guenter
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] b... Tom Lane
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKER... Bruce Guenter
- [HACKERS] Re: CRC Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: CRC Bruce Guenter