"Horst Herb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Surely you don't trust your TCP connection to the >> server, either? > TCP _IS_ heavily checksummed. Yes, and so are the disk drives that you are asserting you don't trust. My point is that in both cases, there are lots and lots of failure mechanisms that won't be caught by the transport or storage CRC. The same applies to anything other than an end-to-end check. regards, tom lane
- RE: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing versi... Tom Lane
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testing v... Nathan Myers
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testi... Tom Lane
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta t... Nathan Myers
- [HACKERS] RFC: CRC datatype Horst Herb
- RE: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC datatype Christopher Kings-Lynne
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC datat... Horst Herb
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC d... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: C... Horst Herb
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: C... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: CRC d... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] RFC: C... Horst Herb
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta testi... Bruce Guenter
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta t... Ian Lance Taylor
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] b... Bruce Guenter
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] beta t... Tom Lane
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKERS] b... Bruce Guenter
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HACKER... Tom Lane
- Re: CRC was: Re: [HA... Bruce Guenter
- [HACKERS] Re: CRC Nathan Myers