> I will not complain about sticking a "version 1.0" field into a format > when there is no real intention of changing it in the future ... but > assigning deep significance to major/minor numbers, or something like I assume the version would be the COPY format version, not the PostgreSQL version. -- Bruce Momjian | http://candle.pha.pa.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] | (610) 853-3000 + If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill, Pennsylvania 19026
- [HACKERS] COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
- [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file format proposal Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file format propo... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file format p... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file form... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY file... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BINARY ... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Bruce Momjian
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Nathan Myers
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] Re: COPY BIN... Tom Lane