Mitch Vincent wrote: > > Regardless of what license is best, could the license even be changed now? I > mean, some of the initial Berkeley code is still in there in some sense and > I would think that the original license (BSD I assume) of the initial source > code release would have to be somehow honored.. I'm just wondering if the PG > team could change the license even if they wanted to.. I should go read the > license again, I know the answer to the above is in there but it's been a _Every_single_ copyright holder of code in the core server would have to agree to any change. Not a likely event. -- Lamar Owen WGCR Internet Radio 1 Peter 4:11
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Mitch Vincent
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Trond Eivind GlomsrØd
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version (not really anymo... Hannu Krosing
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Horst Herb
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version bpalmer
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Jan Wieck