> >I totaly missed your point here. How closing source of ERserver is related > >to closing code of PostgreSQL DB server? Let me clear things: > > (not based on WAL) > > That's wasn't clear from the blurb. > > Still, this notion that PG, Inc will start producing closed-source products > poisons the well. It strengthens FUD arguments of the "open source can't > provide enterprise solutions" variety. "Look, even PostgreSQL, Inc realizes > that you must follow a close sourced model > in order to provide tools for the corporate world." ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Did you miss Thomas' answer? Wasn't it clear that the order is to provide income? Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Tom Samplonius
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Thomas Lockhart
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Adam Haberlach
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Don Baccus
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Vadim Mikheev
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Martin A. Marques
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version The Hermit Hacker
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Mitch Vincent
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Trond Eivind GlomsrØd
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Lamar Owen
- Re: [HACKERS] beta testing version Martin A. Marques