> >> I'm guessing this is a variant of the problem Philip > >> Warner reported yesterday. Probably WAL-related. Vadim? > > > Probably, though I don't understand how WAL is related to > > execution plans. Ok, it's easy to reproduce - I'll take a look. > > Could just be a question of a different pattern of table accesses? > Let me know if you want help looking... Fixed - fdstate was not properly setted in fd.c:fileNameOpenFile with WAL enabled, sorry. Philip, please try to reproduce crash. Vadim
- [HACKERS] regressplans failures Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Mikheev, Vadim
- Re: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Philip Warner