"Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> I'm guessing this is a variant of the problem Philip Warner reported >> yesterday. Probably WAL-related. Vadim? > Probably, though I don't understand how WAL is related to execution plans. > Ok, it's easy to reproduce - I'll take a look. Could just be a question of a different pattern of table accesses? Let me know if you want help looking... regards, tom lane
- [HACKERS] regressplans failures Peter Eisentraut
- Re: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Tom Lane
- RE: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Mikheev, Vadim
- RE: [HACKERS] regressplans failures Philip Warner