"Mikheev, Vadim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> I'm guessing this is a variant of the problem Philip Warner reported
>> yesterday.  Probably WAL-related.  Vadim?

> Probably, though I don't understand how WAL is related to execution plans.
> Ok, it's easy to reproduce - I'll take a look.

Could just be a question of a different pattern of table accesses?
Let me know if you want help looking...

                        regards, tom lane

Reply via email to