> I have also mentioned this on two occasions now, and each has met with > total silence. I have come to interpret this to mean either (a) the idea is > too stupid to rate a comment, or (b) go ahead with the proposal. Since I am > not really proposing anything, I assume the correct interpretation is (a). I would interpret (c) it is not really that much of a problem for many, and what you have done so far was such an improvement that all are happy for a while. Andreas
- AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and ob... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_du... Philip Warner
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about p... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts abo... Philip Warner
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Pete Forman
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Schemas (Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thought... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Schemas (Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy... Philip Warner
- AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and ob... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Zeugswetter Andreas SB