> >Do we still need the lastsysoid column in pg_database if we do things > >this way? Seems like what you really want is to suppress all the > >objects that are in template0, so you really only need one lastsysoid > >value, namely template0's. The other entries are useless AFAICS. > Where would you store the value if not in pg_database? Would probably best be a fixed value, that leaves room for modifications in template0, that might be necessary for new versions. This oid would have to be explicitly set as last step of initdb. Andreas
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump an... Tom Lane
- AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and ob... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_du... Philip Warner
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about p... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts abo... Philip Warner
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Tom Lane
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Pete Forman
- Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Schemas (Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thought... Peter Eisentraut
- Re: Schemas (Re: AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy... Philip Warner
- AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and ob... Zeugswetter Andreas SB
- AW: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and ob... Zeugswetter Andreas SB