On Wednesday 08 November 2000 10:15, Tom Lane wrote: > > At 14:04 7/11/00 -0500, Jan Wieck wrote: > >> FWIW, what about having another "template0" database, where > >> nobody can add user data. Initially, template0 and template1 > >> are identically. CREATE DATABASE get's a new switch (used by > >> the pg_dump output) that tells to create it from the vanilla > >> template0 DB (generalized, so someone can setup a couple of > >> template<n>'s) and all objects inherited from template1 > >> (those not in template0) are regularly dumped per database. > > I like that a lot. Solves the whole problem at a stroke, and even > adds some extra functionality (alternate templates). > How does this solve the 'ALTER FUNCTION' problem? -- Mark Hollomon
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts abo... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dum... Mark Hollomon
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts abo... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects... Tom Lane