Philip Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Where would you store the value if not in pg_database? No other ideas at the moment. I was just wondering whether there was any way to delete it entirely, but seems like we want to have the value for template0 available. The old way of hardwiring knowledge into pg_dump was definitely not as good. regards, tom lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and objects... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump and ob... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dump an... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dum... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts abo... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Philip Warner
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... selkovjr
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts... Jan Wieck
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg... Ross J. Reedstrom
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg_dum... Mark Hollomon
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg... Tom Lane
- Re: [HACKERS] Unhappy thoughts about pg... Philip Warner